While you may have heard the phrase "injury case" or "injury lawyer,"
those phrases do not do justice to the diversity of the ways people
suffer injuries or the diversity of our practice. We set out below a
small sample of our cases, so that you can appreciate what we do and
what kinds of events may lead to just claims. The ethical rules that
pertain to the legal profession do not permit us to discuss how
these cases turned out.
It depends on your individual circumstances and
injuries. If you are meeting with us soon after your injury, our answer
will surely be: "We don't know, yet." It may be too early to know enough
about your case, and you will probably still be recovering from your
injuries. The value of your case cannot be evaluated until your medical
condition has stabilized, permitting your doctor to assess whether you
have suffered injuries or limitations that are permanent.
The law does provide that your compensation (if
deserved) must be full, fair and reasonable. You are not entitled to a
windfall, but neither should you be saddled with an amount that is
unfairly low.
Normand & Associates recently resolved a major case
involving a father who broke his back on a water slide and suffered
permanent injuries, but we also settled a small claim for a young man
who sprained his neck in a rear-end collision, received medical
treatment for only six weeks, and fortunately will have no future
problems. Every injury claim must be individually evaluated to make
certain that full and fair compensation is obtained under all of the
circumstances.
Several factors are taken into consideration in
evaluating a case. Is the defendant clearly at fault? Can the injury be
readily proved? Will there be probable future medical treatment and
disability? Have there been lost wages? Will there be future lost wages?
Will the plaintiff be liked by the jury?
Normand & Associates takes a realistic approach to
injury claims and works with the client every step of the way,
eliminating the need for the client to deal with the insurance company.
For many clients, that is our most valuable service.
Please feel free to call any of our attorneys or send
an e-mail message. Because each case is different and because we need to
safeguard the confidentiality of your information, we may opt to reply
to your question by mail. Please provide us with a mailing address,
e-mail address and telephone number to ensure a prompt response to your
inquiry.
Results for:
After the insurance company
refused to make a fair settlement offer, our client allowed us
to take her case to court where a fair New Hampshire jury
awarded her $400,000 after listening to the evidence. The
medical condition was described by the doctor to be a permanent
injury. The verdict was approximately six times more than
the last unreasonable offer made by the insurance company.
In addition to the verdict, was awarded interest on the amount
of the verdict plus court costs. While the insurance
company continued to fight and filed a motion asking for a new
trial, the trial judge denied the motion stating that the
verdict was reasonable under the circumstances.
Client’s own insurance company
refused to make a fair settlement offer in an uninsured motorist
case. The case was sent to arbitration where the three (3)
member arbitration panel awarded the client and his wife
$125,000 a number twice the amount of the last insurance company
offer.
A southwestern New
Hampshire logging truck operator was involved in serious head-on
collision when a careless youth cut in front of the truck at the
last second thinking that he could beat the truck at an
intersection. Our truck driver took significant evasive
action to avoid literally rolling over the careless operator of
the car, causing his truck to crash into a ditch after colliding
with car. The hearty truck driver toughed it out and
sought limited medical treatment of less than $4,000 thinking
that he would recover quickly. As the months passed,
however, the truck driver continued to have emotional distress
associated with this crash and was subsequently diagnosed with
post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) by his therapist.
The liability insurance company unreasonably fought this case
all the way and finally paid the policy limit of $50,000 after
the lawsuit had been drafted and forwarded to the insurance
company. The truck driver also had underinsured motorist
insurance coverage with his own insurance policy to provide
other coverage for the likely permanent injuries that will
result.
A 30-year old client was involved in a multi-vehicle
collision when she was stopped in a line of traffic and the
vehicles behind her were struck and then crashed into her.
The client sustained a cervical strain, shoulder strain and low
back strain. Her medical record
revealed that she had prior back and shoulder problems.
The insurance company tried to argue prior condition but the
documentation showed that she was well before this crash.
The total medical bills were approximately $14,000. The
case was settled prior to suit for $50,000.
The wife of a U.S. Postal worker
was injured in a car crash when her vehicle was t-boned by a
careless driver entering an intersection and failing to stop at
a stop sign. The 40-year old client was taken to the
hospital by ambulance as a precaution. She was diagnosed
as having cervical sprain and multiple bumps and bruises.
The client was referred by her
physician to a course of physical therapy as well as an
evaluation with an orthopedic surgeon. The orthopedic
surgeon did not see that there was anything that required his
treatment. After a period of time, however, our client
continued to have pain in her chest where her seatbelt had
caused a bruise. Her physician subsequently recommended
the excision of a cyst that was probably caused by the trauma of
the seatbelt during the crash. The total medical bills
exceeded $16,000. The client was out of work one week and
had aches and pains for a period of time. She made good
recovery, although she continued to have some periodic degree of
pain one year later when the case was settled for $57,000.
Our single parent mom was hurt in a car crash
when she was stopped at a red light. Two other drivers crashed in
front of her causing their vehicles to both crash into her. She was
not at fault and got hurt.
The insurance company first tried to deny fault and later
offered only $29,000. We urged our client to go to court.
The jury saw through the insurance smokescreen and awarded
our client five (5) times what the insurance company offered, plus
interest. ($150,000 plus
interest and cost of $31,000)
Ask for a second opinion on value if the insurance company is
not being fair.
Young engineer starting his career is rear ended
on Rt. 93 while on the job.
When the injuries did not improve after several months, he
consulted with an attorney.
When the insurance company was not reasonable, he and his
wife accepted our recommendation to go to court.
The court awarded them three (3) times what the insurance
company offered plus interest ($200,000 plus $25,000 for interest
and costs). Actual
settlements and/or verdicts are dependent on the unique facts of
each case.
When Martin was hurt in a rear end collision
while on the job, he contacted his Attorney Normand when he was
worried about his family.
Facing foreclosure on his home and still not fully recovered,
we were able to get a quick settlement by initiating suit.
While the amount was on the low side of fair, the recovery
did allow Martin and his family to cope in this difficult economic
environment. Learn about
your legal rights before you agree to settle with the insurance
company.
Our client, a 38-year old father of two children,
should have been enjoying a fun day at a Maine water slide park.
Instead, after sliding down the slide into a pool of water that was far
too shallow, he sustained a fractured back that required four surgeries,
causing him to be disabled from his employment. Normand & Associates
worked in conjunction with a retained State of Maine law firm to prove,
through expert witnesses brought in from Florida, that the water slide
was negligently designed, maintained, and managed. We also worked
closely to make certain that our client received sound medical care to
get back up to speed as soon as possible. Unfortunately, while his
condition improved substantially, he will be disabled from his past
employment for the rest of his life. He had other vocational
opportunities available, and the retraining for those opportunities was
part of our claim.
Our client, a dental hygienist, was injured when her
car was rear ended by a careless driver who did not notice traffic
stopping. She sustained pain in her neck and lower back, with later
headaches requiring chiropractic treatment. Her bills totaled $8,000.00,
but she made a good recovery.
Our 23-year old client was injured when her vehicle
was rear ended by a careless driver who failed to stop in time. She
sustained a cervical sprain. After treating with the chiropractor for
six weeks, she fortunately had no further difficulties.
Our client, a server at a fast-food restaurant,
crashed into a vehicle that failed to stop at a stop sign, resulting in
a police summons being issued to the other driver. Our client sustained
a strain to her cervical and lumbar spine for which she required medical
treatment. She incurred medical bills and lost wages. The insurance
company disputed the length of time that she treated for the injury.
Our client, a 25-year old man awaiting enlistment
into the United States Air Force, was attempting to enjoy an evening in
his local pub. When an argument arose between some patrons, he attempted
to calm down the angry customers. While his back was turned, he was
attacked from behind by one of the people involved in the argument. The
owner of the bar, who was also the bartender, thought that a fight was
likely to break out and moved to immobilize our client by gripping him
in a bear hug. Due to the carelessness of the bar owner, our client fell
backward and was seriously injured, sustaining a spinal cord injury. He
received medical care, and incurred substantial medical bills, but was
still left with a permanent impairment. Vocational rehabilitation
experts reported that he will earn less money over his lifetime as a
result of the injuries. He also had to curtail his plans to serve his
country in the Air Force.
Our client was forced, as part of his job, to dismantle and
maintain a piece of heavy machinery.
The manufacturer denied any liability and stated that our client
must have been careless in doing his job. In addition to claims for
workers' compensation benefits, a lawsuit was started against the
machine manufacturer.
The procedure recommended by the manufacturer required
our client to actually stand on top of the machine, bend down, and
lift a 40 pound piece of the machine. He sustained a herniated disc
while performing this task. It was our impression, subsequently
proven by expert witnesses, that the machine was negligently
designed because it did not provide a safe method for removal of the
heavy part from the machine.
Our client, a 40-year old certified nurse's aid, was
a front seat passenger in a vehicle driven by her fiancé. They were
heading home from a day at the beach and were traveling in a westerly
direction on Route 101 in Stratham, N.H. The other driver, a 62-year old
female from out of state, was driving a rental vehicle in an easterly
direction on Route 101. Apparently, she was looking down at a map and
veered over the center line, crashing head-on into our client's vehicle.
The impact was so severe that our client's legs were crushed underneath
the dashboard. She underwent surgery to implant rods and screws in both
thigh bones. She also sustained a fractured collarbone, several
fractured ribs, a torn spleen, and a collapsed lung. It was determined
that she would be totally disabled from CNA work for the rest of her
life and would need future surgeries. Due to the severity of the
injuries, a lifetime plan had to be worked up and considered.
Our client, a 16-year old boy, was hurt when his
vehicle, driven by a 15-year old friend, ran off the road when racing
down the street at a high rate of speed. Our client sustained a
laceration to his forehead, which left a visible scar, a fractured
wrist, and four fractured ribs. He required extensive medical treatment.
The insurance company claimed that while the driver was primarily at
fault for crashing the car, our passenger had some degree of fault for
getting in a car with an unlicensed driver in the first place.
Our client, a certified nursing assistant, was driving to her
sister's funeral when a careless driver took a left-hand turn in
front of her, causing a severe crash. Our client was taken to the
hospital by ambulance and sustained a concussion and cervical
strain. She also developed an aggravation to a pre-existing
condition of depression, and sustained significant emotional
distress associated with the fact that she had to miss her sister's
funeral. In the absence of a fair offer from the insurance company,
we had to file suit on behalf of our client.
Our single mom was hurt in a car crash when she stopped at a red
light waiting for the light to change. Two other drivers crashed
in front of her causing their vehicles to crash into her. The
insurance company first denied fault and later offered $29,000.
Our client accepted our recommendation; we sued and obtained a
jury verdict for this very deserving client in the amount of
$150,000 plus interest and costs.
Our client, a fourteen year old gymnast, was hurt
in a low speed car crash with little property damage to the
vehicles. Due to a very active lifestyle with many prior sports
injuries, the suspected compression fracture to the spine was hotly
contested by the three insurance companies involved. The case
settled shortly after mediation for six figures. The necessary
Superior Court approval of the minor settlement was obtained without
the usual need for Probate Court Guardianship supervision due to the
method of structuring the settlement for the minor child.
If your child has been hurt, make certain that you work with
competent medical providers to properly evaluate the likely future
impact of the injury.
With good medical opinions, your attorney can obtain the
needed monetary settlement now to compensate for future treatment
and physical problems. A
settlement is final and will not be re-opened in the future to
address the unanticipated need for further medical treatment.
A good attorney works closely with caring doctors to project
the likely medical future as much as is humanly possible and
structure that likely treatment into the settlement.
Every injury case is unique
and the examples above of actual cases handled by this office is
no reflection of what your case may be worth. We cannot
guarantee an outcome. We can only guarantee that we know
injury law in New Hampshire and actively help injury victims
obtain reasonable outcomes on a daily basis.